Effect of VDRA on survival in incident hemodialysis patients: results of the FARO-2 observational study.

Nephrology, Dialysis and renal Transplant, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS-Policlinico, Milan, Italy. pmessa@policlinico.mi.it. Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan - Renal Division - San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy. mario.cozzolino@unimi.it. Dialysis Unit, "Simone Martini", Milan, Italy. diego.brancaccio@tiscali.it. Department of Nephrology, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy. cannpino@gmail.com. Divisione di Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy. f.malberti@ospedale.cremona.it. AbbVie Italy, Campoverde, Latina, Italy. annamaria.costanzo@abbvie.com. AbbVie Italy, Campoverde, Latina, Italy. umberto.paparatti@abbvie.com. AbbVie Italy, Campoverde, Latina, Italy. vincenzo.Festa@abbvie.com. AbbVie Italy, Campoverde, Latina, Italy. giuliana.gualberti@abbvie.com. Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari Respiratorie Nefrologiche e Geriatriche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy. sandro.mazzaferro@uniroma1.it.

BMC nephrology. 2015;:11

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mortality rate among patients with stage five chronic kidney disease (CKD) maintained on hemodialysis (HD) is high. Although evidence suggests that use of Vitamin D Receptor Activators (VDRA) in CKD patients increases survival, few studies have examined the effect of VDRA in incident HD patients. The FARO-2 study evaluated the clinical outcome of VDRA therapy on mortality in incident HD patients. METHODS FARO-2 was a longitudinal epidemiological study performed on 568 incident HD patients followed prospectively from 26 dialysis centers over a 3-year period. Data were collected every 6 months using a questionnaire, obtaining clinical, biochemical and therapeutic parameters. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine cumulative probability of time-to-death and adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS 568 patients (68% male) with an average age of 65.5 years were followed up. Mean dialysis duration at study entry was 3 months. VDRA use increased from 46% at 6 months to 54.7% at 36 months of follow-up (p = 0.08). No difference was observed in the presence of comorbid diseases at baseline in patients with and without VDRA therapy. Cumulative probability of survival at 24 months was 74.5% (95% CI: 70.2-78.3). Patients receiving VDRA therapy showed a significant increase in survival at 24 months (80.7%; 95% CI: 75.7-84.8) compared to those without (63.3%; 95% CI: 54.8-70.7, p <0.01). The presence of vascular disease, decreased hemoglobin, increased P and lack of VDRA treatment were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Lack of VDRA treatment still remained significant as a predictor of mortality after adjusting for levels of PTH, P and Ca (HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.09-4.30, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Findings from FARO-2 indicate that in incident HD patients VDRA therapy was associated with increased survival.

Methodological quality

Metadata